MY MESSED-UP LIFE IN CANADA AFTER BEING ENTICED
TO COME FROM THE U.K. BY SNC (NOW SNC-LAVALIN)
WHO IS ROBERT CHISHOLM?___________CLICK HERE
PLEASE E-MAIL ME AT attention_to_the_facts@hotmail.com IF YOU NOTICE ANY PROBLEMS WITH BROKEN /
CORRUPTED LINKS OR PAGES NOT DISPLAYING PROPERLY.
THE PROBLEMS WITH SNC AND
SNC-LAVALIN DESCRIBED ON THIS SITE ALL OCCURRED DURING OR BEFORE 1995 WHEN THE
COMPANY WAS BEING RUN BY PRESIDENT AND C.E.O. GUY SAINT-PIERRE AND HIS
PREDECESSORS. FROM 1996 UNTIL HIS
RETIREMENT IN MAY 2009 THE COMPANY WAS RUN BY JACQUES LAMARRE, WHEN HE HANDED
IT OVER TO PIERRE DUHAIME.
EVERYBODY INVOLVED HAS BEEN COVERING
EVERYTHING UP, THE WHOLE TIME FROM 1982 UNTIL NOW – INCLUDING CERTAIN MEDIA
PEOPLE WHOM I APPROACHED AT VARIOUS TIMES WHO REFUSED TO REPORT ANYTHING.
THIS TYPE OF COVERUP ON THE PART OF
THOSE INVOLVED HAS BEEN BASED ON
NOTHING MORE THAN MONEY TO FEED TO LAWYERS, OBSESSION WITH LOOKING GOOD WITHIN
A NARROW AND NARCISSITIC LITTLE SOCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL CLIQUE - AND WEAK-KNEED, PETTY AND UN-SUBSTANTIABLE
NOTIONS INVOLVING CANADIAN-STYLE POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.
TIME TO SMARTEN UP AND PUT A STOP TO
THIS.
Robert T. Chisholm, November 2009
If Canada says it wants working immigrants and actively entices them to come here, who should assume the responsibility for ensuring satisfactory conditions such that they can contribute to the tax base? The Nesa and Selladurai Premakumaran case (ca. 2005) and the Dr. Short / SNC case (1987): analysis of two flawed Court judgements.
The Premakumarans web site: http://www.immigrationcanadascam.com
1. WRONGFUL DISMISSAL BY SNC IN MONTREAL, QUEBEC FOLLOWED BY THE DISCOVERY OF CORRUPTION IN BUSINESS (SPECIFICALLY SNC AND THOSE
ASSOCIATED WITH THEM), CORRUPTION IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION IN QUEBEC AND CORRUPTION IN QUEBEC GOVERNMENT UNDER LATE QUEBEC PREMIER ROBERT
BOURASSA. SNC BANK ACCOUNT AT ROYAL BANK OF CANADA SEIZED IN 1991 FOR
NON-PAYMENT OF COURT JUDGEMENT WHILE THEY WERE TAKING OVER LAVALIN INC.
WARNING: IN THE PAST, PRIME MINISTER STEPHEN HARPER HAS LABELLED
CANADA AS A NATION OF
DEFEATISTS. CLICK
HERE
OBVIOUSLY
THIS DEFEATISM WILL NOT DO. THEREFORE:-
(A)
NOBODY IS TO ATTEMPT TO TELL ME THAT “NOTHING CAN BE DONE BECAUSE OF THE
LEGISLATION”, OR SOME SUCH
(B)
ANYONE IN A POSITION OF POWER IS TO RECOGNIZE THAT A SOLUTION, TO
EXPUNGE THE CORRUPTION INVOLVED, IS
REQUIRED. PRETENCES TO THE CONTRARY
COULD BE SEEN AS UN-PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, AND WORSE BESIDES.
Sun August 12 2007: Chief justice
objects -- lawyers are not – quote - rats
So, Mrs. McLachlin, according to
you, Lawyers are not rats. And what would you have to day about THESE, and the
people at SNC-Lavalin who fed them large sums of money to make a filthy mess and
waste time? Think again, Mrs. McLachlin.
And what is more, Mrs. McLachlin,
how would you justify the 1991 conduct of Michel Corbeil, assistant to late
Quebec Premier Robert Bourassa when he supported the behaviours, just referred
to, of SNC and their lawyers?
That too is documented on this
site. Something more for you to analyze and think about.
NOT VERY GOOD, IS IT?
You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader version 4 or
later to view some documents on this site.
Get Adobe Acrobat Reader HERE
This site should be viewed using a screen resolution of 600 x 800
----------------------------------------
2.
GETTING WORK, OR TRYING
TO GET WORK IN CANADA: MY PERSPECTIVE. WORKPLACE
ATTITUDES TOWARDS THOSE OUT OF WORK: THIS PLACE HAS BEEN A STUPID MESS FULL OF
MIS-INFORMED, PREJUDICED PEOPLE.
CLICK HERE
----------------------------------------
3.
PROBLEMS WITH
GETTING RE-TRAINING SPECIFICALLY, REFUSAL OF ADMISSION TO ON-SITE PROGRAM IN
1995/1996. INVOLVEMENT OF LAWYERS: LYING AND LEGALISTIC
SOPHISTRY BY HRDC LEGAL SERVICES DEPT. LAWYER JONATHAN P. LANGSNER IN 1996.
4. PROBLEM NO. 3 LED TO A STILL-CURRENT (2009) LEGAL PROBLEM FOR ME WITH A SO-CALLED SOCIAL ASSISTANCE OVERPAYMENT. I WAS WRONGLY REFUSED UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE BENEFITS ON FEBRUARY 23, 1995, BY A FEDERAL BOARD OF REFEREES HEADED BY ROGER R. PRESSEAULT, WHO IS NOW A MEMBER OF THE ONTARIO COVERNMENTS SOCIAL BENEFITS TRIBUNAL, WITH WHICH I HAD A HEARING IN OTTAWA ON JANUARY 17TH 2007. (In other words, one of the Social Benefits Tribunals own current members was partly responsible for creating the problem in the first place)
Narrative and all supporting documents:
Latest development:-
To cut a long story short, the Social Benefits Tribunal has refused to withdraw the “overpayment” assessment against me. They have been continually attempting to exploit the letter of the law as an excuse for refusal to apply reason and logic or even pay attention to the facts. As a result, in October 2008
I made a formal complaint to the Office of the Ombudsman in Ontario but they have been manipulated by certain Social Benefits Tribunal members into not fulfilling the Ombudsman Office mandate. Because of this perverse result,
today I have written personally to Ontario Ombudsman Andre Marin asking him to intervene and resolve the matter to my satisfaction. Here is my Open Letter to Andre Marin (dated December 19th 2009):-
ALL PERSONS FOUND TO BE PARTIES TO CORRUPTION AND
UN-PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AT MY EXPENSE ARE LIABLE TO EXPOSURE AND PUBLIC
CENSURE. PENALTY COULD INCLUDE LOSS OF JOB AND CAREER. BE WARNED, OR PAY THE
PRICE.
Sun August 12 2007: Chief justice
objects -- lawyers are not 'rats'
And what, Mrs. McLachlin, would you have to day about THIS LOT who
were responsible for the mess described immediately above, and the people in
the Government of Ontario who fed them large sums of money to make a filthy
mess and waste time? Think again, Mrs. McLachlin.
CONTACT INFO
- PERSONS RESPONSIBLE
----------------------------------------
Current member bios of Ontario government Social
Benefits Tribunal
Reference URL for this as at December 15 2006: http://www.pas.gov.on.ca/scripts/en/bios.asp?minID=39&boardID=120959&persID=108231
See also:-
LIST OF ALL SOCIAL BENEFITS TRIBUNAL
MEMBERS
Reference URL for this as at August 10th 2007:-
http://www.pas.gov.on.ca/scripts/en/BoardDetails.asp?boardID=120959
(Click the BACK
button in your web browser
after viewing these last four items)
----------------------------------------
5.
OTTAWAS HIGH
TECH UNEMPLOYMENT MESS :THE EXPERTS
ARENT EVEN COUNTING THE PEOPLE AFFECTED PROPERLY. AND IM CAUGHT UP IN THIS SAME
MESS. CONFUSION OVER THE NUMBERS OUT OF WORK AND WANTING TO WORK PROSPECTIVE TAXPAYERS, IN CASE YOU HADNT
NOTICED. OFFICIAL UNEMPLOYMENT NUMBERS, GIVEN EACH MONTH TO THE MEDIA BY STATSCAN, ONLY ABOUT 25% OF THE PROBLEM, REST ARE IGNORED. ITS NEARLY THE SAME THROUGHOUT CANADA, NOT ONLY OTTAWA. BLOODY STUPID.
CANADIANS: IT DIRECTLY AFFECTS YOU AND THE AMOUNT
OF INCOME TAX YOU HAVE TO PAY. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT.
----------------------------------------
6. (A) MORE ON UNEMPLOYMENT IN CANADA AND NON- AVAILABILITY OF FUNDING FOR
RE-TRAINING: WARNING
CLICK HERE
(B)
SOLVING THE
PROBLEM: THE BUSINESS CASE; CREATE JOBS IN THE NUMBERS REQUIRED; STOP THE
NONSENSE IN HIRING PRACTICES; STOP THE OBSESSION OVER APPEARANCES CONNECTED
WITH RESUMES, INTERVIEW TECHNIQUE, CUT AND COLOUR OF BUSINESS SUIT, BODY
LANGUAGE ETC.
----------------------------------------
7. AND WHAT ABOUT THE MATHEMATICS? HOW LONG MIGHT IT TAKE YOU TO GET A
JOB IF THERE ARE BETWEEN 300 AND 5,000 OTHER PEOPLE COMPETING WITH YOU? HOW
WOULD YOU OPTIMIZE THE TREND IN YOUR BANK BALANCE IF YOU WERE FACED WITH THIS?
WHAT MIGHT THIS MEAN FOR THE TAX BASE? SO YOU DONT THINK THERE IS A PROBLEM?
THINK AGAIN.
CHALLENGE TO READERS:-
1. IF, AFTER LOOKING AT THE MATHEMATICS, YOU AGREE THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH NO SIMPLE SOLUTION, THEN YOU CAN CONSIDER OFFERING ROOT-CAUSE BASED SOLUTIONS, WHICH INVOLVES MORE THAN JUST MATHEMATICS.
2. IF YOU THINK THIS REPRESENTS AN EASY MATHEMATICS PROBLEM WITH AN UN-AMBIGUOUS ANSWER , THEN TRY FINDING THE SOLUTION TO THE FOLLOWING (ITALICS):-
Derive a set of equations for
optimizing the trend in the bank balance of someone who is out of work. Show
how to apply them. State all assumptions made. State any and all limitations of
your method. Give details of what to do under all conditions in which your
method is limited by factors which are not knowable and outside the job seekers
control. You are to assume that there are between 300 and 5,000 other competing
for every job that you apply for.
Use a web site to display your
answer if you wish, in which case all you need send to me is the URL.
The URL of your web site may
also point to a .pdf file, if you prefer to do it that way.
Hint: you might want to consider
a probability and statistics-based approach.
I reserve the right to display
any or all answers received, or links to any web site(s) where they might be
posted.
This is a serious matter which
demands serious answers.
I will be reviewing answers
from time to time and I reserve the right to forward them to other math
teachers, University professors etc. for comment.
MORE INFORMATION,
COMING SHORTLY :-
F.A.Q.s page, where I will post answers to your questions.
CONTACT DETAILS:-
ROBERT T. CHISHOLM B.Sc. Hons. (Mechanical
Engineering, Univ. of Bath, U.K., 1970)
Visual Software Developer (Willis College of
Business and Technology, Ottawa, 1998)
e-mail:
attention_to_the_facts@hotmail.com
FAX:
1-208-246-8017